The Trial of Charles Taylor

International Criminal Justice in the Making

  • Welcome to the Trial of Charles Taylor Blog

    This site will provide news and expert analysis — updated regularly when the Court is in session — throughout the trial of Charles Taylor. It is intended as the primary resource for all those interested in the trial, with a particular emphasis on reaching West African audiences.
  • Share your thoughts on the trial!

    Join the conversation.

    In our central discussion forum, you can share your views on the trial. If you prefer to comment on individual posts, just click on the link below that post. If you are the first to comment on a post, the link will read "No Comments".
  • Trial Calendar

    The trial is being conducted Monday through Thursday in three sessions from 9:30-11:30, 12:00-1:30, and 2:30-4:30. There is usually no afternoon session on Fridays.
  • Stay Updated

    Click here to add your name to our list, and we will send you an email whenever the site is updated.

    Or you can subscribe to our RSS feed below. What's RSS you might ask? Check out this painless introduction. Please note that we don't support Yahoo. We just like their Q & A on RSS feeds.

  • Subscribe

Appeals Chamber Upholds Convictions of AFRC Leaders

Posted by Webmaster on February 22, 2008

Today the Special Court’s Appeals Chamber in Freetown upheld the convictions of three former members of the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC).  Alex Tamba Brima (a.k.a. “Gullit”), Brima Bazzy Kamara, and Santigie Borbor Kanu (a.k.a. “55″) were convicted of 11 of 14 counts of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious violations of international law in June 2007.  Trial Chamber II (Judges Sebutinde, Doherty and Lussick — the judges currently hearing the Taylor case) presided over that case.  Brima and Kanu each received sentences of 50 years, while Kamara received a 45 year sentence. 

Of potential significance to the Taylor trial, the Appeals Chamber reversed the Trial Chamber’s decision that the Prosecution had not properly pled the issue of Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE).  Essentially, JCE is a theory not explicitly referenced in the Special Court Statute under which an individual can be held responsible for all crimes committed pursuant to the existence of a common plan or design that involves the commission of a crime if the defendant participates with others in the common design. (see past commentary by Professor Schabas on the Trial Chamber’s June 2007 decision, and a 2005 law review article regarding the development of JCE liability.)

A press release concerning the Appeals Chamber’s ruling can be found here, while comments by chief Prosecutor Stephen Rapp on the decision can be found here.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>